How many FPS does Shadow of the Tomb Raider get on the MacBook Pro M3 Max? 1080p, 1440p and 4K performance
121FPS
1080p High
Estimate
82
1440p
43
4K
About 121 FPS at 1080p on High: Shadow of the Tomb Raider runs through Rosetta 2 on the MacBook Pro M3 Max (Apple M3 Max, 30-core GPU, 36 GB). It has headroom to spare, so you can raise resolution or quality.
Data reviewed October 1, 2026 · how we calculate it

Don't have Shadow of the Tomb Raider yet?
Official Steam key that also activates on Mac. Cheaper on Eneba.
Play in your browser — no downloads, no sign-up.
Shadow of the Tomb Raider FPS on MacBook Pro M3 Max by resolution and quality
Estimate| Resolution | Low | Medium | High | Ultra |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1080p | 144FPS | 136FPS | 121FPS | 106FPS |
| 1440p | 110FPS | 98FPS | 82FPS | 69FPS |
| 4K | 60FPS | 52FPS | 43FPS | 36FPS |
Estimated average in normal gameplay with the game and macOS up to date. Green: 60+ · lime: 45+ · amber: 30+ · orange: 20+ · red: under 20.
Recommended settings
For 60 FPS
1440p · Ultra
≈ 69 FPS
For 30 FPS
1440p · Ultra
≈ 69 FPS
Moving to 1440p High puts the MacBook Pro M3 Max at about 82 FPS. This game has no MetalFX, so resolution is the setting that matters most.
The MacGameFPS verdict
Calibrated on real Mac benchmarks, not spec sheets
Is the MacBook Pro M3 Max enough for Shadow of the Tomb Raider?
Yes, comfortably: 121 FPS at 1080p High. You can move to 1440p (82 FPS) or your display’s native resolution.
Excellent · 1440p 82 FPS · 4K 43 FPS
MacBook Pro M3 Max or MacBook Pro M4 Max for Shadow of the Tomb Raider?
In Shadow of the Tomb Raider at 1080p High, the MacBook Pro M3 Max gets 121 FPS and the MacBook Pro M4 Max 141 FPS: 17% more.
MacBook Pro M3 Max specs

- Chip
- Apple M3 Max
- GPU cores
- 30 / 40
- Unified memory
- 36 / 48 / 64 / 96 / 128 GB
- Cooling
- Fan
- Geekbench Metal
- 125,208
- Tier
- Mid range · 34/100
How much memory do you need?
On Apple Silicon the GPU shares memory with the system, so the RAM you picked when buying the Mac is also your video memory. Shadow of the Tomb Raider asks for 8 GB minimum.
| Memory | 1080p High | 1440p High |
|---|---|---|
| 36 GB | 121FPS | 82FPS |
| 48 GB | 121FPS | 82FPS |
| 64 GB | 121FPS | 82FPS |
| 96 GB | 121FPS | 82FPS |
| 128 GB | 121FPS | 82FPS |
Other Macs for Shadow of the Tomb Raider
1080p · High

MacBook Pro M3 Pro
M3 Pro · 14/18 GPU
66FPSView analysis
Mac Studio M3 Ultra
M3 Ultra · 60/80 GPU
152FPSView analysis
MacBook Pro M4 Max
M4 Max · 32/40 GPU
141FPSView analysis
MacBook Air M3
M3 · 8/10 GPU
35FPSView analysis
Mac Studio M4 Max
M4 Max · 32/40 GPU
142FPSView analysis
MacBook Pro M2 Max
M2 Max · 30/38 GPU
117FPSView analysis
Mac Studio M2 Max
M2 Max · 30/38 GPU
119FPSView analysis
MacBook Pro M3
M3 · 10 GPU
48FPSView analysis
Shadow of the Tomb Raider on every Mac →
Shopping for an all-round gaming Mac? Mac ranking by real FPS →
Other games on the MacBook Pro M3 Max
- Assassin's Creed Shadows32FPS
- Crimson Desert50FPS
- Cyberpunk 207756FPS
- Baldur's Gate 380FPS
- Control Ultimate Edition78FPS
- Death Stranding Director's Cut125FPS
- Hitman World of Assassination132FPS
- Lies of P139FPS
- Metro Exodus117FPS
- Resident Evil 4105FPS
Official Mac requirements
- Minimum
- macOS 10.15 · Intel Core i5 2 GHz · 8 GB memory · 2 GB AMD Radeon R9 M290 or 1.5 GB Intel Iris 540 · 40 GB storage · Intel build, runs on Apple silicon through Rosetta 2
Source: store.steampowered.com
FAQ
Can the 36 GB MacBook Pro M3 Max run Shadow of the Tomb Raider?
Yes. With 36 GB we estimate 121 FPS at 1080p High.
Can Shadow of the Tomb Raider hit 60 FPS on the MacBook Pro M3 Max?
Yes: at 1440p Ultra it runs around 69 FPS.
What about 1440p and 4K?
On High, the MacBook Pro M3 Max gets about 82 FPS at 1440p and about 43 FPS at 4K in Shadow of the Tomb Raider. These are native figures.
Do these figures include MetalFX or ray tracing?
No. The headline figure is native resolution, no MetalFX and no ray tracing. Shadow of the Tomb Raider has no MetalFX on Mac. Ray tracing, where a game offers it, costs a lot of FPS on any Mac.
Is Shadow of the Tomb Raider native on Apple Silicon?
Not quite: it has an official macOS version ported by Feral Interactive, but built for Intel. On Apple Silicon it runs through Rosetta 2, built into macOS, with nothing else to install. Our figures already include that overhead.









